[Ur] Implicit problem in typeclass recursive instance [testable t] -> testable (list t)
Adam Chlipala
adamc at csail.mit.edu
Fri Jan 23 08:25:04 EST 2015
I believe you were just missing the [@@] prefix for identifiers, to
disable implicit argument resolution in particular cases.
structure Foldable : sig
class foldable :: (Type -> Type) -> Type
val mkFoldable : t ::: (Type -> Type) -> (a ::: Type -> b ::: Type ->
((a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b)) -> foldable t
val foldr : t ::: (Type -> Type) -> a ::: Type -> b ::: Type ->
foldable t -> (a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
end = struct
type foldable t = a ::: Type -> b ::: Type -> (a -> b -> b) -> b ->
t a -> b
fun mkFoldable [t](f: a ::: Type -> b ::: Type -> (a -> b -> b) ->
b -> t a -> b) = @@f
fun foldr [t][a][b] (f: foldable t): (a -> b -> b) -> b ->
t a -> b = f
end
open Foldable
val foldable_list : foldable list = mkFoldable @@List.foldr
On 01/23/2015 03:19 AM, Gabriel Riba wrote:
> I have another question about free type variables of class methods. I can
> make them work by bringing them to class parameters.
>
> (* Foldable *)
>
> structure Foldable : sig
> class foldable :: (Type -> Type) -> Type -> Type -> Type
> val mkFoldable : t ::: (Type -> Type) -> a ::: Type -> b ::: Type ->
> ((a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b) -> foldable t a b
> val foldr : t ::: (Type -> Type) -> a ::: Type -> b ::: Type ->
> foldable t a b -> (a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
> end = struct
> type foldable t = fn a b => (a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
> fun mkFoldable [t][a][b](f: (a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b) = f
> val foldr [t][a][b] (f: foldable t a b): (a -> b -> b) -> b ->
> t a -> b = f
> end
>
> open Foldable
>
> val foldable_list [a][b]: foldable list a b = mkFoldable List.foldr
>
> (* --- *)
>
> Is there a way to define the free type variables of methods existentially or
> should I stick to the previous design?
>
> (* --- *)
>
> type foldable t = a :::Type -> b:::Type -> (a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
>
> (* --- *)
More information about the Ur
mailing list