[Ur] solution to the DB chicken and egg problem?
Marko Schütz Schmuck
markoschuetz at googlemail.com
Sun Apr 2 10:10:10 EDT 2017
On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 09:02:15 -0400,
Adam Chlipala wrote:
>
> Actually, Ur/Web won't even accept those table definitions: no mutually recursive
> definitions yet, w.r.t. constraints. And I haven't thought before about allowing
> temporary breaking of constraints.
"Constraints hold after every statement" -> "Constraints hold after
every transaction"?
> On 04/02/2017 08:35 AM, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:
> > If I have tables
> >
> > table chicken : { Id : int, Egg : int }
> > PRIMARY KEY (Id),
> > CONSTRAINT egg FOREIGN KEY Egg REFERENCES egg(Id)
> >
> > table egg : { Id : int, Chicken : int }
> > PRIMARY KEY (Id),
> > CONSTRAINT chicken FOREIGN KEY Chicken REFERENCES chicken(Id)
> >
> > Outside of Ur/Web this would be solved by setting the constraints
> > DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED and do the INSERTs pairwise inside a
> > single transaction.
> >
> > I doubt that there currently is a way to do this in Ur/Web since there
> > is neither a way to specify DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED nor a way to
> > explicitly form transactions.
> >
> > Would it be enough to introduce an operator
> >
> > dml_sequence : dml -> dml -> dml
> >
> > allowing two dml statements to be composed and run in a single
> > transaction together with exposing DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED at
> > the Ur/Web language level?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Marko
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ur mailing list
> Ur at impredicative.com
> http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://www.impredicative.com/pipermail/ur/attachments/20170402/e6e82bac/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ur
mailing list