[Ur] Ur/Web people organizer: editable table with fixed (hidden) field?
Adam Chlipala
adamc at csail.mit.edu
Thu Apr 13 15:14:29 EDT 2017
It seems the outcome is that someone would need to add this feature, but
it's probably along the lines of code already present for other modules.
On 04/11/2017 01:47 PM, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:13:19 -0400,
> Ziv Scully wrote:
>> Am I correct in thinking that you basically want something like InputStrings's "const" and "given"
>> parameters, but for EditableTable?
> Yes, from what I can tell...
>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 13:03 Marko Schütz Schmuck <markoschuetz at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:18:59 -0400,
>> Adam Chlipala wrote:
>> >
>> > If the "user" field is not editable, how do you choose which user to associate with a new row?
>>
>> I was thinking that it could be a transaction argument to the widget
>> function like
>>
>> ...
>> val widgets = {User = sinkWidget (getCookie userC), ...}
>>
>> alternatively maybe it should be another part of the struct passed to
>> the EditableTable.Make functor like "permission"?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marko
>>
>> > On 04/11/2017 12:10 PM, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:58:31 -0400,
>> > Adam Chlipala wrote:
>> >
>> > OK, so you don't want to support adding or deleting rows, just editing the ones that
>> > already exist? I'm not sure UPO has something like that right now, but I'd need to look
>> > through the code again to be sure.
>> >
>> > No, no: adding and deleting are required too. It's just that I want to
>> > have the User field not editable. A "sink widget" that does not
>> > display but can be assigned as the widget of a field might work? The
>> > field would still be in the records and be stored in the table.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Marko
>> >
>> > On 04/10/2017 04:14 PM, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:
>> >
>> > I was wondering whether the tools available in UPO are already
>> > sufficient to cover the following:
>> >
>> > I have a table where each user can register several tuples. For now,
>> > I'd like to present it as an editable table where the field User is
>> > not editable (not even visible) and will be constants for all tuples
>> > entered by that user.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Marko
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ur mailing list
>> > Ur at impredicative.com
>> > http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ur mailing list
>> > Ur at impredicative.com
>> > http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
>> >
>> >
>> > [2 <text/plain; utf-8 (base64)>]
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ur mailing list
>> > Ur at impredicative.com
>> > http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ur mailing list
>> Ur at impredicative.com
>> http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
>>
>>
>> [2 <text/plain; utf-8 (base64)>]
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ur mailing list
>> Ur at impredicative.com
>> http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ur mailing list
>> Ur at impredicative.com
>> http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.impredicative.com/pipermail/ur/attachments/20170413/c659b7dd/attachment.html>
More information about the Ur
mailing list